The Engine for Enrichment

This past weekend was our annual Culture Impact Forum featuring award-winning broadcaster, writer, and speaker Dick Staub. He delivered four captivating sessions from his latest book entitled ‘The Culturally Savvy Christian: A Manifesto for Deepening Faith and Enriching Popular Culture in an Age of Christianity-Lite.’

I started Friday night’s introduction with the metaphor of ‘poor vision.’ The Church suffers from poor vision insofar as we struggle to see how Christ’s kingdom gets worked out in culture. At the conclusion of the seminar I closed our time by suggesting that Dick had given us the gift of improved sight, a sort of theological Lasik surgery, if you will. Let me share just one element of this vision.

The idea is not new, but I suspect it came into sharper focus for everyone listening. Simply put, Dick asserted that the enrichment of culture with gospel life must happen on a grassroots level in the context of community. Moreover, the engine that drives this vision is a simple piece of furniture located in most churches today: the pulpit. The pulpit and the two square feet of space located behind it are the most important pieces of real estate in the entire world, for it is there that God speaks through a mere mortal. Why does the Church often fail to infuse the culture with gospel life? Listen to what is being preached from today’s pulpits and you will find your answer. The late Gardiner Spring explains this concept in some detail.

Gardiner Spring (1785-1873) was minister of the Brick Presbyterian Church in New York City from 1810 to 1873, establishing it as a center of powerful evangelical preaching. He was regarded both for his preaching and his writing, and one of his significant works was The Power of the Pulpit. First published in 1848, this volume remains an enduring text on pastoral ministry.

“What would New England have been without her pulpit? . . . There is no part of Christendom that has not acknowledged these incidental influences of the pulpit, in forming its habits and character, in elevating and purifying its institutions, in stimulating and extending its literature, in modifying its usages and laws, and in giving more or less of peculiarity to the measures and policy of its government. It necessarily gives a direction to the current of human thought,—men of talent, in every department of human life, feel its influence. It has been felt everywhere;—in the councils of warriors in the field, and of statesmen in the Senate-house. Kings on their thrones have listened to its voice, and the populace has been moved by it. Men of all religious persuasions, and of no religious persuasion, believers and infidels, feel its influence; all orders and combinations are, to a greater or less extent, subjected to its power.

In past ages of the world, few moral causes did more in moulding the habits of human thought, than the various forms of scholastic philosophy, but its powerful influence waned, and eventually was eclipsed by the Christian pulpit. Other influences there are which act upon the public mind; the press acts upon it; seminaries of learning act upon it; legislation acts upon it; courts of law act upon it; the theatre and the opera act upon it; the fine arts act upon it; and the exchange acts upon it; and all with prodigious power. Some of these are the immediate and direct antagonists of the pulpit; and its business is to oppose and neutralize them. Some of them are directly auxiliary to it, and some of them indirectly. As such, we honor them. But if we draw a line around any other department of human influence, and compare it with the pulpit, we must do the greater honor to this divine institution. It has no physical force to boast of; it is its moral power which is its glory. Its conflict is not the conflict of rushing bayonets, but of truth with error; nor are its victories those where men are trodden down and trampled on, but where they are lifted up. It has power above the field of battle, above the Forum, above the Senate-house. Yes it has power above them all. Compare them. Inspect them. And then say which has the more important influence upon national character. Inspect them impartially; and whose sway is the widest, and which occupies the largest space?1”

If you would like a CD recording of the Dick Staub seminar, you may obtain one by contacting my assistant, Ms. Sarah Schneider at SSchneider@College-Church.org.

Footnotes:

1 Gardiner Spring, The Power of the Pulpit (New York: Baker and Scribner, 1848), 55-58.

Share this article on…

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
More Articles

Our Basic Need

In her first novel, Wise Blood, Flannery O’Connor says of her character Hazel Motes that “there was a deep, black, wordless conviction in him that

Read More »

Models of the Church

When I was in seminary, Professor Rick Lints made a memorable statement. After lecturing on the Reformation’s conception of salvation, he asserted that “This generation

Read More »

The Crux of Gospel Preaching

The acclaimed Italian operatic tenor Luciano Pavarotti was a nervous wreck before every performance. Perhaps this would be the day that he would finally fail?

Read More »